Lo Ximiendo
17 okt 2010 lid geworden
Verwijderde inhoud Toegevoegde inhoud
→Nederlands, alstublieft!: explanation |
|||
Regel 25:
::I am sorry that I have to bother your with all these questions, but I really would like to get this working well.--[[Gebruiker:MarcoSwart|MarcoSwart]] ([[Overleg gebruiker:MarcoSwart|overleg]]) 10 jan 2020 11:40 (CET)
::Apparently you had not read my questions before you started to use the template in our main namespace again. Dutch wiktionary has several contributors who are not active on a daily basis, so as a general rule I wait at least a week before I assume that no reaction implies no objection. I hope you understand I had to undo your additions for the moment. In particular replacing valid transcriptions in Dutch by transcriptions to English seems unjustified, but more in general: let's first fix the template/module before using it on a wide scale. --[[Gebruiker:MarcoSwart|MarcoSwart]] ([[Overleg gebruiker:MarcoSwart|overleg]]) 10 jan 2020 12:09 (CET)
::: Concerning the interpretation, line 5 is Wiktionary's in-house Romanization based on phonemes. User Wyang devised the Romanization scheme, but has left this online venture, likely out of stressing frustration. I'm not sure if he (or she) expected that I could export the Romanization scheme to different versions of Wiktionary (like Turkish, Italian, Japanese and Romanian; besides, it has been exported to the Thai Wiktionary, albeit with at least one omission, and the Chinese Wiktionary).
::: My understanding of the template km-IPA is, that the standard orthography, including alternative forms of words, is used for page titles, while the phonemes are meant to show readers the proper IPA pronunciation. (Take the word [[ចក្រ]] at the English Wiktionary, for instance; it has two different pronunciations for the same word in standard orthography.) --[[Gebruiker:Lo Ximiendo|Lo Ximiendo]] ([[Overleg gebruiker:Lo Ximiendo|overleg]]) 10 jan 2020 12:14 (CET)
| |||